Skip to content
Angry Indigenous
Menu
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Angry Notes
  • Self Notes
  • To the World
  • Review
    • Movies
    • Food
    • Places
  • Uncategorized
  • The Communist Grasshoppers
    • Laos
    • Myanmar
    • Thailand
    • Vietnam
Menu

Why I Against the “Fortress Conservation” Model

Posted on December 17, 2022April 20, 2025 by Rallu
Fortress conservation is a model of conservation that seeks to protect natural areas by strictly limiting human access and activities…

Fortress conservation is a model of conservation that seeks to protect natural areas by strictly limiting human access and activities within these areas. While this model may seem like an effective way to protect the environment, it can often have negative impacts on the rights and livelihoods of Indigenous Peoples who have lived in and depended on these areas for generations.

One of the main problems with fortress conservation is that it often involves the eviction or displacement of Indigenous communities from their traditional lands. This can be done through the creation of national parks or other protected areas that exclude human habitation, or through the enforcement of strict rules and regulations that limit the ability of Indigenous Peoples to access and use the resources in these areas.

This displacement can have serious consequences for Indigenous communities, as they are often reliant on the natural resources found in these areas for their livelihoods, food security, and cultural practices. For example, Indigenous communities may be dependent on hunting, fishing, and gathering in these areas for sustenance, or may rely on the resources found there for traditional practices such as medicine and spiritual ceremonies. The loss of access to these resources can have a significant impact on the health and well-being of these communities.

In addition to the loss of access to resources, the eviction or displacement of Indigenous communities can also lead to the loss of cultural knowledge and traditions that are closely tied to these areas. For many Indigenous communities, the land and ocean are not just a source of resources but is also a key part of their cultural identity and traditions. The loss of access to these lands and oceans can lead to the erosion of these traditions and cultural practices, which can have long-term consequences for the cultural survival of these communities.

Another problem with fortress conservation is that it often does not adequately involve or consult with Indigenous communities in the decision-making process. This can lead to conservation efforts that are not in line with the needs and values of these communities, and can even lead to conflicts between conservation efforts and the rights and interests of Indigenous peoples.

Overall, fortress conservation can have serious negative impacts on the rights and livelihoods of indigenous peoples. While the protection of natural areas is important, it is also important to ensure that these efforts are carried out in a way that respects and protects the rights of indigenous communities and takes their needs and interests into account.

Fortress Conservation also exists in the ocean

Protected marine areas, also known as marine protected areas (MPAs), are designated areas of the ocean that are set aside for the protection of marine life and biodiversity. While the creation of MPAs can have many benefits for the environment, they can also have negative impacts on the rights and livelihoods of Indigenous Peoples who depend on the ocean for their livelihoods and cultural practices.

One of the main problems with MPAs is that they can restrict the access and use of marine resources by Indigenous communities. Many Indigenous communities rely on the ocean for their livelihoods, including fishing, hunting, and gathering shellfish and other marine resources. The creation of MPAs can limit or even prohibit these activities, which can have serious consequences for the food security and economic well-being of these communities.

In addition to the loss of access to resources, the creation of MPAs can also lead to the displacement of Indigenous communities from their traditional lands and waters. This can be done through the creation of no-take zones, which prohibit any form of resource extraction within the MPA, or through the enforcement of strict regulations on activities such as fishing and hunting. This displacement can have serious consequences for the health, well-being, and cultural survival of Indigenous communities.

Another problem with MPAs is that they can fail to adequately involve or consult with indigenous communities in the decision-making process. This can lead to conservation efforts that are not in line with the needs and values of these communities, and can even lead to conflicts between conservation efforts and the rights and interests of indigenous peoples.

For example, in many cases, MPAs are created without the full participation and consent of indigenous communities, and may not take into account their traditional rights and interests. This can lead to conflicts over the use and management of marine resources and can undermine the rights and sovereignty of indigenous communities.

Furthermore, the enforcement of MPA regulations can often be heavy-handed and punitive, with indigenous communities facing fines, arrests, and even violence for engaging in traditional activities that are deemed to be in violation of MPA regulations. This can further erode the rights and dignity of these communities and can create a climate of fear and mistrust between indigenous communities and conservation authorities.

Overall, the creation of MPAs can have serious negative impacts on the rights and livelihoods of Indigenous communities. While the protection of marine ecosystems is important, it is also important to ensure that these efforts are carried out in a way that respects and protects the rights of Indigenous Peoples, and takes their needs and interests into account.

This can be done through the meaningful participation and consultation of Indigenous communities in the decision-making process, the recognition of traditional rights and interests, and the development of alternative livelihoods and resource management strategies that are compatible with conservation goals. By ensuring that the rights and interests of Indigenous communities are respected and protected, it is possible to create MPAs that benefit both the environment and the people who depend on it.

Share this content:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Regarding Borders
  • Ode to the Empty Chair
  • Chief of War: A Canoe of Stories on the Ocean of Time
  • The Blood in Our Battery: How ‘Green Energy’ Re-fuels a Colonial Legacy
  • Stone Coffee: Sai Ying Pun Cultural Embassy

Recent Comments

  1. Titik Kartitiani on Hi all, I am back!

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • February 2024
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • April 2022
  • August 2021
  • February 2019
© 2026 Angry Indigenous | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme